Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrew Paulson vs Matyas Cerny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paulson vs Cerny analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrew Paulson vs Matyas Cerny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paulson 2 - 0 Cerny
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paulson has won 53.64% of points on their second serve, while Cerny has won 54.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paulson, in recent form, has won 46.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cerny has won 57.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 35.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paulson has saved 82.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cerny has saved 58.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paulson has won 68.89% of matches played (W/L 31/ 14), with Cerny winning 64.71% (W/L 22/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paulson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 26/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24). Cerny has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 46/ 32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Paulson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12), where as Cerny has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 21/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paulson winning 2 times and Cerny being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paulson winning 4 and Cerny winning 0. The last match between Paulson and Cerny was at the M25 Lodz, 09-08-2023, First, Clay with Andrew Paulson getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paulson and Cerny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paulson winning 0 times and Cerny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paulson winning 1, and Cerny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paulson has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.04 while Cerny has played against players with an average rank of 119.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paulson has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cerny has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paulson has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cerny has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
318
Rank
302
High
22
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
63% (156-92)
Career Total W/L
56% (54-42)
67% (2-1)
YTD W/L
71% (12-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrew Paulson | Matyas Cerny |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:30 | 1:35:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (73/116) | 57% (66/115) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (56/73) | 56% (37/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (20/43) | 45% (22/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (56/115) | 34% (40/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Andrew Paulson
Player
Matyas Cerny
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Matyas Cerny
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrew Paulson | Matyas Cerny |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (2/1) | 71% (12/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 71% (25/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (39/32) | 61% (185/120) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 71% (10/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.07 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 104.67 | 67.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (129/239) | 66% (407/614) |
| 1st Serve W% | 80% (103/129) | 67% (271/407) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (59/110) | 55% (113/207) |
| BPs Won% Total | 25% (7/28) | 44% (35/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (88/239) | 43% (272/626) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 71% (12/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Andrew Paulson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Andrew Paulson
52%
(
56 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
60 of
111)
5
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
8
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
111
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Mirza Basic
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jiri Vesely
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Andrew Paulson
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
10
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Andrew Paulson
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
101)
20
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Andrew Paulson
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
13
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Louis Wessels
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
19
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
11
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jakob Schnaitter
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matyas Cerny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Matyas Cerny
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Gergely Madarasz
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Milos Karol
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Jakub Filip
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Attila Boros
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Matyas Cerny
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Razvan Baiant
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Niels Visker
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Matyas Cerny
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Paulson Vs Cerny Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Andrew Paulson
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
